International Masters of Gaming Law Tweets

International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Casiello: Massachusetts kept gaming, with 60% voting to keep. But some have said they need to look out for the 40% opposed. Difficulties..
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Nick Casiello, Fox Rothschild, New Jersey: NJ governor is running for President and to get Adelson's money, Christie may get more hostile.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
McGuiness: GOP in control in DC may cause problems long term, but unclear now. Colorado is safe.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Sean McGuiness, Lewis & Roca, Nevada: New AG in Nevada aligned with Sheldon Adelson and may have big impact on online gaming going forward
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
New Developments in the Gaming World panel. Nick Nocton of Jeffrey Green Russell, London is moderating. #IMGL #Florence
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Hambach: conclusion...very, very difficult to get anything that will work...at least in the near future.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Chmiel:Parties in the processing chain are all across the globe.Requires amending the entire banking IT system to effectively block payments
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Marstrander: Government is rich, but other entities (arts, theater, etc.) are as poor as ever. At some point funds will be needed.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
@justingaminglaw: Norway says why do we need to regulate...we are the richest government in the world (with huge state fund).
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Marstrander: Next step, in Norway, will be to introduce and consider a licensing scheme...but that is still a long way off.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Marstrander: Norway has measures that don't work but they just keep repeating it. They will ultimately go to a licensing regime. #IMGL
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
@justingaminglaw : not sufficient. Need media blocking, ISP blocking, etc., to really work at all. #IMGL
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
@justingaminglaw: criticism on how effective payment blocking will be. Regulators and operators seem to agree that payment blocking alone
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
@justingaminglaw : Current value of compacts is very little. But it may be included in the upcoming legislation in Netherlands. #IMGL
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
@justingaminglaw: Government says that no requirement of agreement between banks and govt, but moral obligation!! Some have agreed. #IMGL
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
@justingaminglaw, Kalff, Katz & Franzen, Netherlands: There is no setup for financial blocking in the law. But there is some cooperation.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Marstrander: Last govt report made no move to more effective financial blocking...they have given up. Operators now have more market share.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Marstrander: Gaming operators went to third party providers (PSPs) to get around blocking,and it has worked, for the operators, but not govt
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Marstrander: The govt wanted to protect its monopoly...but payment blocking has failed to protect monopoly. #IMGL
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Joakim Marstrander, Deloitte Tax and Legal, Norway: Norway has the monopoly system of gaming. Financial blocking set up in Norway.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Chmiel: Disguising the operator and/or the cardholder creates additional problems. Therefore there is no protection via financial blocking.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Chmiel: The theory only works if the proper MCC is used; but mis-coded transactions foil the MCC denial scheme. #IMGL #Florence
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Chmiel: Due to massive lack of information, MCC blocking is used (eg in US) and simply decline all transactions. Does it help?
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Chmiel: next is the merchant acquire, followed by acquiring processor, and finally the credit card scheme. All of which have limited info.
Reply Retweet Favorite
International Masters of Gaming Law Icon
User IMGL
Chmiel: First is cardholder, second the Operator, third the card issuer (who knows the merchant category code), fourth the issuing processor
Reply Retweet Favorite